DVDs Don’t Go Bad, Do They?

I’m a bit of a movie junkie.  Okay, a lot of a movie junkie.  Once during a conversation with a colleague, he was trying to remember the name of a movie – which he described as “the pregnant burger movie.”  I said, “Oh, Home Fries with Luke Wilson and Drew Barrymore?”  He said, “Yes!  You’ve seen it?”  And I replied, “No.”  

Yeah, my brain just retains stuff like that.  Incidentally, I did see it some time after that.  But now I don’t remember much about it other than it was  “the pregnant burger movie.”

With my movie addiction comes a large dvd collection.  The kind where I’ve had to find alternative storage because those plastic cases take up too much space.  It’s those darn cheap bins at Target and Walmart!  The dvds don’t really go “bad” – and a $5 dvd is cheaper than going to the theatre.  So I wind up with a lot of movies.

Thanks to the quarantine, I’ve started to go through my movie collection.  Hopefully there will be some fun surprises as I watch old favorites – and some enjoyable new films.  (Yes, I sometimes pick up a film, intending to watch it later, and then forget about it.  Especially if I buy it near finals.)  Maybe I’ll even find some movies that I don’t think are worth keeping and might actually shrink my collection.

Probably won’t happen since I’m a pack rat and I love bad movies, but that’s probably an issue for a therapist.

I’m trying to go in rough alphabetical order unless a whim takes me.  (How can I not watch Jaws on July 4th?)  I know some people would alphabetize a film that starts with a number under the spelling of that number, but I put the numerical ones first.  Seven  goes under S, but something like 101 Dalmatians goes at the beginning.

Speaking of, I had forgotten many details about 101 Dalmatians.  The twilight bark!  The insane capabilities of Cruella’s car to make it up and down snowy ditches – that’s impressive.  And sheer cuteness of the scene where the puppies are all watching the Thunderbolt show – and they’re all wagging their tails – so I’m a sucker for cartoon puppies – it happens. 

Then there’s The 10th Kingdom.  Underrated in many ways.  Yes, the golden retriever who is a major character was adorable.  But an interesting blend of fairy tale elements and fun.  I still can’t hear “Whiter Shade of Pale” without thinking of the mushrooms singing “cartwheels cross the floor.”  

2 Guns was also fun.  I mean, Denzel could read the phone book out loud and it would be a work of art, so anything with him can make my list.  Throw in Bill Paxton, and it’s worth watching.  Based on a comic book series, though I have not read it, which explains some of the outlandish bits.  

And 300 . . . Michael Fassbender notwithstanding, well, it’s a Snyder film.  Look, I appreciate the ways they tried to use some of the cool bits from the comic – and some of the visuals are amazing.  But geez, the narration?  The overacting?  The endless slo-mo?  Plus I still loathe – and yes, I mean loathe – what they did with the Queen’s character.  I understand that they wanted to have something more for Lena to do, but what they chose . . . Gorgo would have kicked Theron’s ass for even asking for sex.  No way she would have done that.  Does not work with her character at all.

The worst part?  I picked up 300 as a set – two movies on one dvd – so the sequel (which I have avoided until now) is lurking out there, waiting for me to watch it.  But that’s for another night.

Revenge and Passion

The fall semester has started again, and I have a new group of students who are stuck with me for their English class. I probably fall into the category of the slightly-weird-but-enthusiastic teacher. Yes, even after teaching for some years, I can still begin the semester in an enthusiastic frame of mind.

This is largely because I sincerely believe in the value of my subject. Critical reading and writing skills are helpful in so many ways, even if the students are a bit resistant to the idea. I am continually looking for ways to get the students interested – at least a little – in reading and writing.

So recently I have been reminiscing about important moments that I have had with literature.

A friend on Facebook (yes, too much time on FB when I should be working – quit judging me!) raised this question:

“For those of you who grew up reading comics: what was one thing about a character or plot that just blew your mind?”

I read comics when I was younger, but I don’t remember being particularly astounded by any one character or plot. I have always loved fantasy and science fiction, so I accepted pretty easily the fantastical parts of mainstream superhero comics.

I fell out of reading comics in high school. Instead, I split time between fantasy novels (like Anne McCaffrey, Mercedes Lackey, and the Dragonlance stories) and historical romance novels (the kind that had shirtless Fabio types on the cover) and classics (my eighth grade teacher had introduced me to Shakespeare – so I was getting more interested in the “classics” that were assigned at school).

Then one night in college, I was stuck in my dorm room on a Saturday night, alone (fight with the boyfriend) and grumpy (finished one book but no new book on deck – I’ve long since fixed that tragic habit!) but not desperate enough to do homework. My roommate’s boyfriend had left a graphic novel in the room. So I picked that up and read it.

My perspective shifted radically.

The book was The Crow, and I was floored that a comic would address rape and murder and revenge. It was like The Duchess of Malfi in comic form. That’s when I got back into comics – first, remembering how much I liked them, and second, realizing that they were just like books – they could be anything, encompass everything – and there were whole depths out there to be sounded. The possibilities of literature exploded.

Then just a few months later, I had an additional revelation about books.

I was talking with a friend, telling him that my boyfriend had insisted we spend the summer dating other people to “see if we were sure” about each other (no, it didn’t work out the way he thought it would). So I was a free agent.

I said, “It’s too bad you’re still dating ____ because I always wanted to go out with you.”

He replied, “Don’t say that! I always wanted to go out with you, too!”

Then of course came the moment where we both looked at each other and thought, “What now?”

The next night we got together to talk about the situation and agreed we were interested in seeing what was there beyond friendship. But while I was free, he was not. So any exploration would have to wait. He suddenly said, “I want to read you something.”

‘I can’t make love to you,’ she said.

Relief and despair.

‘But I can kiss you.’

And so, from the first, we separated our pleasure. She lay on the rug and I lay at right angles to her so that only our lips might meet. Kissing in this way is the strangest of distractions. The greedy body that clamours for satisfaction is forced to content itself with a single sensation and, just as the blind hear more acutely and the deaf can feel the grass grow, so the mouth becomes the focus of love and all things pass through it and are re-defined. It is a sweet and precise torture.

from The Passion, by Jeanette Winterson

I fell madly in love (I think with the book, the author, and the guy).

I’d never had anyone read something to me before (and wow, if you’re a word nerd like I am, it’s quite romantic). I had always appreciated literature. I had plenty of books I adored and thought were moving and meaningful or funny and full of great descriptions, but this was perhaps the first time I recognized that the author had captured what I felt but had not put into words myself.

It was a revelation about how a book could touch me, how words could be so powerful and sensual, how an idea can resonate on a personal frequency.

I was twenty, and I thought I knew about love and passion (as many of us do at that age). But this was a new level of intensity. I could feel the words humming through me. I think it was the first time I understood how literature could be erotic, for the body and the mind. And beautiful in an intense, intimate way.

If pressed, I would say this was the moment I decided I had to be a writer. I thought, if I can do this, write something that someone reads and feels “yes! that is exactly what I would have said if I had thought of it!” then I would have accomplished something worthwhile with my life.

Of course, that’s not easy to measure, so I may be setting myself up for abject failure. But aren’t writers supposed to be tortured? Perhaps not – that way lies wearing too much black and hanging out in coffee shops while I bemoan society’s disdain for learning. As long as I can avoid the beret . . .

I know that my students may never feel that urge to write, but I hope they can find a piece of writing that speaks to them in some way, some work that helps them recognize the power of language. Maybe something that broadens their definition of literature. Maybe something that touches them personally. It doesn’t have to be anything that I assigned, but something. I wish everyone could experience the meaning and solace that can be found words.

Because even though Flaubert may be right, that “human speech is like a cracked kettle on which we tap crude rhythms for bears to dance to, while we long to make music that will melt the stars,” we can still dance to simple music, and only practice will produce music that can melt the stars.

Binging Without Fear

I am a comics nerd. I think I have already established that, but just a note up front in case there’s any confusion. So naturally I have already worked my way through the new Netflix Daredevil series. I’m glad there were only 13 episodes, because I do have to do other work this weekend. I am greatly impressed (even the opening titles were amazing) and very much looking forward to the Jessica Jones and Luke Cage series – and Iron Fist to an extent, but he was never my favorite (couldn’t get past the collar and the slippers).

As for Daredevil, I am thrilled. I like the character and I think there are some great stories to be told with him. The 2003 film did not do him justice. It was not the low point of the recent spate of comics movies (I think that’s a dead heat between Catwoman and Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance), but I would put it in the bottom half. I won’t spend much time pulling that one apart because that’s been done before. From annoying missed opportunities (Bullseye specifically says he wants a costume – why doesn’t he get one?) to spots that seem problematic for the plot (why is Matt displaying his fighting skills out in public for a random woman? A blind guy fighting like that is pretty memorable), the film had plenty of problems. However, it also had Michael Clark Duncan, who could make reading a shopping list sound good.

This Daredevil is played by Charlie Cox (wonderful in Stardust), who gives an impressive performance. His scenes with the priest, talking about his responsibilities and the devil inside him, are very well done. I don’t know how much of the physical performance is his – I would presume at least some. But he manages to convey a fair amount with a tilt of his head and body posture when he’s in the black outfit. And I absolutely love the fight scene in the second episode – where he proves that Murdocks don’t go down. It’s a refreshing approach to show the hero having trouble, struggling to do what he needs to do, all the way through the fight. (If you’re a Steven Seagal fan, well, I can’t explain it to you. But it adds depth. Again, if you’re a Steven Seagal fan, I can’t explain that to you.) We assume Matt will make it because he’s the hero – but we admire him more because despite his enhanced senses, he’s so clearly human. And we respond to his humanity, both the good and the bad.

The serial nature of comics can lend itself very well to the equally serial medium of television. While I love many of the big screen versions of comics, the constraints of the medium are just different. And I’m thinking more along the lines of story than effects. For a film, one page of script is roughly equal to one minute of screen time. So even a two hour film might be only 120 pages. That’s shorter than most novels.

13 episodes of about 60 minutes each comes out to around 780 pages. Of course the show can do much more with that! And having the whole series at once relieves the creative team of certain pressures associated with shows these days. Shows used to get a whole season; if they weren’t popular, they wouldn’t be renewed. But now, shows have maybe two or three episodes to deliver ratings. And that’s just not enough time. Not enough time to build characters or even word of mouth.

A complete season at once is like a 13 hour long movie. The writers on Daredevil did not feel the need to give the whole backstory in the first episode because they knew they could reveal it slowly. They knew they had time to develop the characters, build tension, use moments that would be cut for time in a film. The whole episode between Foggy and Matt would have been a single scene in a film – and that would be a shame.

Comics readers love the characters. That’s why we keep reading. A television series can often treat the characters better (I said often – there are no absolutes – don’t bring up Birds of Prey – I’m still upset about that one).   I’m excited to see what else Netflix can do with these characters. If only the seasons could be made faster!

I do have to add one complaint, though. I can understand the reluctance to put him in bright red spandex. Muted or dark red is fine with me. But did the black splotches on his final costume remind anyone else of Deadpool?